Is the analysis of the critical incident/failure well reasoned and supported?

Clinical Governance Assignment(Attendance and Participation in Group Work = 30% of the total mark)Individual Major Assignment (Essay) = 70%Length：3,000 wordsFor this assessment task, please choose one (1) of the two following options:Option 1: Clinical GovernanceA critical analysis of the factors that contribute to the success or failure of effective safety/ quality/risk management / clinical governance in health care organisations based on learnings from:A high-profile system failure:Reflecting on a high-profile system failure – such as Dr Patel (Queensland) or Mid Staffordshire (United Kingdom) – provides an opportunity to consider, could this happen in my organisation?Your critical analysis should contain at least the following:A synopsis of the ‘event’ and outline the key factors that contributed to the event: put the case into context. For example, organisational culture, a focus on budgets / finance and not patient safety.1. What were the learnings from this event?2. Are the issues that caused this event still prevalent in our health services?3. Why could this happen again?4. Recommendations for actions required to increase the likelihood of success.5. Are there any additional issues that need to be consider.Assessment criteria for Option 1: Clinical Governance1. The paper demonstrates in-depth knowledge of contemporary approaches to quality, safety and risk management, as demonstrated by:• An overview and description of the selected case.• An analysis of the main learnings of this case.• An examination as to whether the circumstances of the case are still a risk in healthcare today.• An explanation as to why or why not this could happen again.• An assessment of potential implications for patients, staff and organisations.• An identification of any other issues which may impact a future occurrence.Weighting 60%2. The application of clinical governance, safety and quality systems, as described in the lectures, demonstrate that the recommendations for action lead to improved healthcare outcomes.Weighting 20%3. Is the analysis of the critical incident/failure well reasoned and supported? Does it reflect a sound understanding of the theory and literature?Weighting 10%4. The assignment clearly communicates its points and arguments together with a clear presentation and layout and is within +/- 10% of the word count.Weighting 10%

Last Completed Projects