Write a research paper outlining the “Consistency, Implications, and Personal Reflection of Comparing Socrates’ Notion of the Examined Life in the Apology and the Republic.”

Write a research paper outlining the “Consistency, Implications, and Personal Reflection of Comparing Socrates’ Notion of the Examined Life in the Apology and the Republic.”The prompt is “In the “Apology,” Socrates claims that the unexamined life is not worth living for a human being.

Analyze and critique the Republic’s accounts of both the just soul and the just city in light of this statement. Are the two dialogues consistent? Explain why or why not, and explain the implications of this juxtaposition. For example, who exactly does Socrates think can and will live a life worthy of a human being? Who not? Why? Finally, to what extent do you agree with Socrates’ views”
Please use citations of both texts (you do not need a citation page just in-text citations)
Please do not use AI my school is extremely strict and I will get expelled.
This paper is worth 25% of my final grade.

Last Completed Projects